How we measure up
We are committed to reducing our environmental impact across our supply chain and operations.
Our approach to reducing the environmental impacts of our operations is long established. We have a comprehensive Environment, Health and Safety (EHS) management system that is based on international standards, including ISO 14001, and we monitor our Group-wide environmental performance for all BAT sites worldwide.
We operate in diverse locations around the world, where environmental legislation, infrastructure, the availability of renewable energy technologies and levels of water scarcity can all vary significantly. Our approach is therefore to understand our impact in these environments, and then put plans in place to minimise it.
We also have an internal reporting system for monitoring Group-wide environmental performance.. Each of our companies has an EHS Steering Committee, with overall environmental responsibility held by the General Manager or site manager. EHS is also a standing agenda item for management meetings and governance committees at area, regional and global levels. This has raised awareness of EHS risks across our business and our aim is to create a consistent approach for our companies in managing them.
Our Group Operations Director has overall responsibility for environmental management and our Management Board is responsible for our Environment Policy.
The Policy applies across all our activities including our supply chain and it requires our companies to:
We know that in order to support global efforts to combat climate change and unsustainable resource use, our long-term targets need to remain ambitious. Which is why, in 2016, when we hit our existing 2017 targets a year early, we immediately set new targets to be reached by 2025. However, in line with best practice, any targets must also reflect the changes in the scale and magnitude of our business activities. This is why, during 2018 and following on from our acquisition of Reynolds American Inc. (RAI), we took the opportunity to once again review our long-term targets so that they would reflect our new operations portfolio. As a result, we undertook a full analysis of our Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions*, establishing a new baseline and allowing targets to be set that account for all of our operations and supply chain.
Earlier in 2019, we gained Science-Based Targets initiative’s (SBTi) formal approval of our new targets and joined the ever-growing number of companies that have committed to making significant emissions reductions, in line with the most up-to-date climate science.
To support us in achieving this target, we have also developed further guidance for our sites on how to assess and increase the renewable energy used and launched our Standard on Climate Change and Energy in December 2018. It sets out the Group’s requirements for each site, such as having a five-year energy plan and considering carbon impact (and alternative renewable energy sources, where possible) when renewing or buying equipment, or entering a new power purchase contract. It also provides guidance to sites on energy sourcing options and outlines key steps a site should consider while developing the energy plan, with a clear preference for renewables, whenever possible.
Alongside new emissions reduction and energy targets, we have set other 2030 environmental targets for water and waste. These aim to further reduce our impact through reduced consumption of resources, improved water stewardship, and ensuring that waste from our operations is reduced, reused or recycled.
Our environmental targets:
We have 55 factories and a further 15 green-leaf threshing sites worldwide which, along with a large distribution fleet, account for more than 90% of our direct impacts, so this is where we focus many of our initiatives.
Examples include investing in energy-efficient technologies, switching to less carbon-intensive fuels and renewable energy sourcing. Currently, 9.3% of our Group energy use is from renewable sources. We’re also optimising our logistics and fleet with standards for fuel efficiency, engine size and emissions, as well as increasing load capacity to reduce the number of journeys.
While our manufacturing processes are less water intensive than many industries, we understand the reality of increasing water scarcity in some parts of the world and this has led us to expand the scope of our water risk assessments. Previously only conducted at our strategic, high-risk sites, these assessments were completed by all our factories and green-leaf threshing sites in 2017.
We recycle or reuse waste within our business, wherever possible. In 2018, we were pleased to achieve a 9% reduction in the amount of waste sent to landfill per million cigarettes equivalent, compared to 2017. We also recycled 90% of our waste in 2018.
Environmental problems cannot be solved by one company acting alone, so we also work in collaboration with others.
In Kenya, for instance, we are members of the Nairobi Water Roundtable, working alongside local government, NGOs and other major companies, including Diageo and Coca-Cola, to find solutions to water scarcity in the area.
Many of the environmental impacts that are associated with growing tobacco are common across agriculture and the only way to completely avoid them would be not to farm any crop, which is clearly not a viable option. So we focus on working to mitigate these inherent risks and implement best practice environmental standards with all the farmers we work with.
Environmental criteria form a central part of the industry wide Sustainable Tobacco Programme and our expert field technicians provide farmers with technical assistance on areas such as sustainable soil, water, biodiversity, and forest and pest management. The benefits of this can be seen in agrochemical usage, which is generally significantly lower in tobacco growing than other comparable crops.
Also, because wood is often used as a fuel for curing, we have programmes in place to avoid and combat deforestation. As a result, in 2018 99% of our contracted farmers’ wood fuel came from sustainable sources.
*Against a 2017 baseline.