british american tobacco p.l.c. sustainability report 2009 - South Africa balanced scorecard

Home
 
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2009
Key:
Performance improved Better
Performance unchanged Same
Performance declined Declined
 
International Marketing Standards20082009TrendNotes
Number of reported instances of partial or non-adherence12Performance declined 
      
Youth smoking prevention20082009TrendNotes
Reports running or supporting youth smoking prevention programmesYesYesPerformance unchanged 
      
Preventing underage access20082009TrendNotes
Reports lobbying / engaging with the government on preventing underage access to tobaccoYesNoPerformance declined 
      
Energy use20082009TrendNotes
Gigajoules per million cigarettes equivalent produced15.3415.36Performance declined1
      
Carbon dioxide20082009TrendNotes
Tonnes CO2 per million cigarettes equivalent produced2.072Performance improved1
      
Waste to landfill20082009TrendNotes
Tonnes per million cigarettes equivalent produced0.0630.041Performance improved1
      
Recycling20082009TrendNotes
Percentage of waste recycled68.86%80.53%Performance improved1
      
Water use20082009TrendNotes
Cubic metres per million cigarettes equivalent produced6.37.29Performance declined1
      
Local succession coverage - 1:1:2 at business unit level20082009TrendNotes
Percentage of business unit with at least one local successor in the short term and two local successors in the long term for each senior positionShort term29%43%Performance improved 
Long term71%86%Performance improved 
      
Local top teams - 70:30 at business unit level20082009TrendNotes
Percentage of local representation on business unit senior management teams67%57%Performance declined 
      
Employee opinion 'Your Voice' survey 2008    
British American Tobacco South Africa vs. Towers Watson South Africa national normScoreDifference from benchmark
Local score in the Engagement category ranked by difference from national benchmark81+6  
      
Gender diversity    
Percentage of women in management grades at business unit level20082009TrendNotes
Management trainees48.1%34.6%Performance declined 
Management grade 3440.5%42.3%Performance improved 
Management grade 3525.5%26.2%Performance improved 
Management grade 3625.4%31.8%Performance improved 
Management grade 3720.0%19.7%Performance declined 
Management grade 384.0%8.3%Performance improved 
Management grade 3925.0%25.0%Performance unchanged 
Management grade 400.0%0.0%Performance unchanged 
Notes
  1. The environmental data is from our online Group-wide EHS reporting system. Previous figures reported in local publications may vary due to differing local reporting standards.