british american tobacco p.l.c. sustainability report 2009 - Brazil balanced scorecard

Home
 
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2009
Key:
Performance improved Better
Performance unchanged Same
Performance declined Declined
 
International Marketing Standards20082009TrendNotes
Number of reported instances of partial or non-adherence00Performance unchanged 
      
Youth smoking prevention20082009TrendNotes
Reports running or supporting youth smoking prevention programmesYesYesPerformance unchanged 
      
Preventing underage access20082009TrendNotes
Reports lobbying / engaging with the government on preventing underage access to tobaccoYesYesPerformance unchanged 
      
Energy use20082009TrendNotes
Gigajoules per million cigarettes equivalent produced9.157.84Performance improved1
      
Carbon dioxide20082009TrendNotes
Tonnes CO2 per million cigarettes equivalent produced0.310.25Performance improved1
      
Waste to landfill20082009TrendNotes
Tonnes per million cigarettes equivalent produced0.0050.004Performance improved1
      
Recycling20082009TrendNotes
Percentage of waste recycled95.63%95.79%Performance improved1
      
Water use20082009TrendNotes
Cubic metres per million cigarettes equivalent produced2.922.84Performance improved1
      
Local succession coverage - 1:1:2 at business unit level20082009TrendNotes
Percentage of business unit with at least one local successor in the short term and two local successors in the long term for each senior positionShort term75%83%Performance improved 
Long term88%67%Performance declined 
      
Local top teams - 70:30 at business unit level20082009TrendNotes
Percentage of local representation on business unit senior management teams88%83%Performance declined 
      
Employee opinion 'Your Voice' survey 2008    
Souza Cruz vs. Towers Watson Brazil national normScoreDifference from benchmark
Local score in the Engagement category ranked by difference from national benchmark85+2  
      
Gender diversity    
Percentage of women in management grades at business unit level20082009TrendNotes
Management trainees45.5%42.9%Performance declined 
Management grade 3440.7%30.2%Performance declined 
Management grade 3530.5%26.8%Performance declined 
Management grade 3629.0%19.8%Performance declined 
Management grade 3728.6%24.1%Performance declined 
Management grade 3829.4%28.6%Performance declined 
Management grade 390.0%0.0%Performance unchanged 
Management grade 400.0%0.0%Performance unchanged 
Notes
  1. The environmental data is from our online Group-wide EHS reporting system. Previous figures reported in local publications may vary due to differing local reporting standards.