british american tobacco p.l.c. sustainability report 2009 - Australia balanced scorecard

Performance improved Better
Performance unchanged Same
Performance declined Declined
International Marketing Standards20082009TrendNotes
Number of reported instances of partial or non-adherence30Performance improved 
Youth smoking prevention20082009TrendNotes
Reports running or supporting youth smoking prevention programmesNoYesPerformance improved 
Preventing underage access20082009TrendNotes
Reports lobbying / engaging with the government on preventing underage access to tobaccoYesNoPerformance declined 
Energy use20082009TrendNotes
Gigajoules per million cigarettes equivalent produced19.8516.85Performance improved1
Carbon dioxide20082009TrendNotes
Tonnes CO2 per million cigarettes equivalent produced2.612.45Performance improved1
Waste to landfill20082009TrendNotes
Tonnes per million cigarettes equivalent produced0.0940.072Performance improved1
Percentage of waste recycled50.28%55.93%Performance improved1
Water use20082009TrendNotes
Cubic metres per million cigarettes equivalent produced5.565.07Performance improved1
Local succession coverage - 1:1:2 at business unit level20082009TrendNotes
Percentage of business unit with at least one local successor in the short term and two local successors in the long term for each senior positionShort term86%100%Performance improved 
Long term100%71%Performance declined 
Local top teams - 70:30 at business unit level20082009TrendNotes
Percentage of local representation on business unit senior management teams29%45%Performance improved 
Employee opinion 'Your Voice' survey 2008    
British American Tobacco Australia vs. Towers Watson Australia national normScoreDifference from benchmark
Local score in the Engagement category ranked by difference from national benchmark79+4  
Gender diversity    
Percentage of women in management grades20082009TrendNotes
Management trainees0.0%30.8%Performance improved 
Management grade 3431.0%27.2%Performance declined 
Management grade 3532.0%36.8%Performance improved 
Management grade 3631.0%33.8%Performance improved 
Management grade 3713.0%24.1%Performance improved 
Management grade 3825.0%33.3%Performance improved 
Management grade 3912.5%0.0%Performance declined 
Management grade 400.0%0.0%Performance unchanged 
  1. The environmental data is from our online Group-wide EHS reporting system. Previous figures reported in local publications may vary due to differing local reporting standards.