| International Marketing Standards | 2008 | 2009 | Trend | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of reported instances of partial or non-adherence | 99 | 3 | 1 | ||
| Youth smoking prevention | 2008 | 2009 | Trend | Notes | |
| Percentage of markets where our business reports running or supporting youth smoking prevention programmes | 67% | 28% | |||
| Preventing underage access | 2008 | 2009 | Trend | Notes | |
| Percentage of markets where our business reports lobbying / engaging with the government on preventing underage access to tobacco | 22% | 22% | |||
| Social Responsibility in Tobacco Production programme | 2008 | 2009 | Trend | Notes | |
| Average self-assessment scores for all leaf suppliers (out of a miximum of 4) | 3.2 | 3.2 | |||
| Energy use | 2008 | 2009 | Trend | Notes | |
| Gigajoules per million cigarettes equivalent produced | 10.99 | 11.37 | |||
| Carbon dioxide | 2008 | 2009 | Trend | Notes | |
| Tonnes CO2 per million cigarettes equivalent produced | 0.86 | 0.9 | |||
| Waste to landfill | 2008 | 2009 | Trend | Notes | |
| Tonnes per million cigarettes equivalent produced | 0.036 | 0.033 | |||
| Recycling | 2008 | 2009 | Trend | Notes | |
| Percentage of waste recycled | 69.24% | 72.55% | |||
| Water use | 2008 | 2009 | Trend | Notes | |
| Cubic metres per million cigarettes equivalent produced | 3.91 | 2.41 | |||
| Local succession coverage - 1:1:2 at business unit level | 2008 | 2009 | Trend | Notes | |
| Percentage of business units with at least one local successor in the short term and two local successors in the long term for each senior position | Short term | 50% | 37% | 1 | |
| Long term | 87% | 50% | |||
| Local top teams - 70:30 at business unit level | 2008 | 2009 | Trend | Notes | |
| Percentage of local representation on business unit senior management teams | 40% | 38% | 1 | ||
| Employee opinion 'Your Voice' survey 2008 | |||||
| British American Tobacco region vs. Towers Watson global FMCG norm | Score | Difference from benchmark | |||
| Score in the Engagement category ranked by difference from benchmark | 78 | +6 | |||
| Gender diversity | |||||
| Percentage of women in management grades | 2008 | 2009 | Trend | Notes | |
| Management trainees | 53.5% | 56.5% | 1 | ||
| Management grade 34 | 38.5% | 34.5% | |||
| Management grade 35 | 35.9% | 41.7% | |||
| Management grade 36 | 30.4% | 40.1% | |||
| Management grade 37 | 26.9% | 44.0% | |||
| Management grade 38 | 9.7% | 50.0% | |||
| Management grade 39 | 12.2% | 0.0% | |||
| Management grade 40 | 5.5% | 0.0% | |||