british american tobacco p.l.c. sustainability report 2009 - Eastern Europe

Performance improved Better
Performance unchanged Same
Performance declined Declined
International Marketing Standards20082009TrendNotes
Number of reported instances of partial or non-adherence993Performance improved1
Youth smoking prevention20082009TrendNotes
Percentage of markets where our business reports running or supporting youth smoking prevention programmes67%28%Performance declined 
Preventing underage access20082009TrendNotes
Percentage of markets where our business reports lobbying / engaging with the government on preventing underage access to tobacco22%22%Performance unchanged 
Social Responsibility in Tobacco Production programme20082009TrendNotes
Average self-assessment scores for all leaf suppliers (out of a miximum of 4)3.23.2Performance unchanged 
Energy use20082009TrendNotes
Gigajoules per million cigarettes equivalent produced10.9911.37Performance declined 
Carbon dioxide20082009TrendNotes
Tonnes CO2 per million cigarettes equivalent produced0.860.9Performance declined 
Waste to landfill20082009TrendNotes
Tonnes per million cigarettes equivalent produced0.0360.033Performance improved 
Percentage of waste recycled69.24%72.55%Performance improved 
Water use20082009TrendNotes
Cubic metres per million cigarettes equivalent produced3.912.41Performance improved 
Local succession coverage - 1:1:2 at business unit level20082009TrendNotes
Percentage of business units with at least one local successor in the short term and two local successors in the long term for each senior positionShort term50%37%Performance declined1
Long term87%50%Performance declined 
Local top teams - 70:30 at business unit level20082009TrendNotes
Percentage of local representation on business unit senior management teams40%38%Performance declined1
Employee opinion 'Your Voice' survey 2008    
British American Tobacco region vs. Towers Watson global FMCG normScoreDifference from benchmark
Score in the Engagement category ranked by difference from benchmark78+6  
Gender diversity    
Percentage of women in management grades20082009TrendNotes
Management trainees53.5%56.5%Performance improved1
Management grade 3438.5%34.5%Performance declined 
Management grade 3535.9%41.7%Performance improved 
Management grade 3630.4%40.1%Performance improved 
Management grade 3726.9%44.0%Performance improved 
Management grade 389.7%50.0%Performance improved 
Management grade 3912.2%0.0%Performance declined 
Management grade 405.5%0.0%Performance declined 
  1. Pre-2009 data for these measures is only available for the whole European region, prior to our regional restructure when it split into East and West.