In 2007, we carried out a three-stage materiality test to establish what issues we should include in this Report and we feel that this has accurately captured the most material issues for a tobacco business. Community investment was not considered to be an issue of high importance to the Group as a whole by those stakeholders who attended the formal dialogue sessions. However, we do accept that our reporting of economic impacts is not as advanced as we would like and that we could do more to explore in the Report the risks and opportunities that sustainability provides.
We think that we have made good progress in this area, including the strengthening of our risk management process to ensure that sustainability risks are adequately captured across the Group. We have also continued to engage with our stakeholders to ensure that our sustainability agenda remains relevant and have begun to address the issue of local materiality. We continue to report on our website issues that are not covered by our sustainability agenda, but are still of interest to our stakeholders.
Ernst & Young LLP attended our London-based stakeholder dialogue events described in the stakeholder engagement section of this Report. These meetings were independently facilitated by Acona and were attended by senior management from British American Tobacco. Ernst & Young LLP concluded that there were no issues raised at dialogue that are not covered in this Report but did highlight the need to regularly review our stakeholder mapping process.
We have developed a methodology, issued guidance and delivered training to ensure a coordinated approach to dialogue across all participating Group companies. This places great emphasis on using dialogue to support mainstream business practice.
Ernst & Young LLP concluded that we have been inclusive in our engagement of stakeholders across the business. However, they also shared our observation that some stakeholders often decline an invitation to engage with us because of the nature of our products.
The principle of completeness is no longer a core element of AA1000AS. However, in response to the comments around completeness that were made by Ernst & Young LLP in our previous Sustainability Report, we have made a number of improvements in this area. We invested in new systems for the collection of Group CSR data, removing the need for a manual collation process at headquarters level and increasing the level of management challenge the data was subjected to. The new system has also resulted in a greater number of companies submitting data. Group companies representing over 96 per cent of our sales volume responded to our request for information and we believe the exclusion of the remainder does not materially affect the understanding of the Group performance. Where appropriate, we continue to set targets for data but acknowledge this as an area that requires further work.
